6
« on: December 20, 2020, 03:51:07 am »
Like a few other Members I am not pleased with the sentence given to Hunter and aura by the Council. As I have said before, I was not aware of all the details of why aura went off on rose, but I trust that rose must have said or done something serious enough that would make a long standing member react in such a matter toward a visitor. In My eyes it must always be remembered that rose was a visitor and aura and her Master were members of long standing.
Granted, like Me, Hunter was not one to hold back in stating His thoughts and could be a pain in the arse for the Council. We have both paid a price for the expressing Our true opinions.. as any true Gorean would. Which raises the question of why the sentence laid down by the Council was so severe. Was it justified.. or was it just an attempt to get rid of an irritant of the Council?
To be totally open and honest I have been in contact with Hunter since the all this came out... but I had been considering finding a new home for the last few months anyway... and had stayed only out of My personal loyalty to Randolph. So if the Council wants of get of another irritant feel free... and My meral and I will move My Home elsewhere.
As last thoughts.. aura earned punishment for not obeying when ordered to stop and cease by the Masters in the room. My rulings would be six months for aura...reduced to 3 months after the the threats thown out by Elder Physician... and three months for Hunter for not being able to contol His slave. Of course, that leaves Uus with rose and her almost total lack of punishment... she gets off lightly and she is not she even Gorean... she is a sub playing house in Healer's cake shop with her Doms permission... again she is or was a visitor... not Gorean.. or at least was not at the time of the incident.
Something for the Council and other Pledged Patrons to think about.